A REVIEW OF COMPROMISE CRIMINAL CASE BUT NOT FULFILL PAKISTAN CASE LAW

A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law

A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law

Blog Article

Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They may be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case law from another state can be considered with the court.

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.

For those who find an error during the written content of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well-settled that even though contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the merit of every one of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of qualified candidates who are found to get most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part on the respondent department.

Article 27 in the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity from the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the distinct negation with the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on proven court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[4]

eight. For the reasons stated higher than, here this court finds the petition to get without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more

The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings from the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of the respective parties. Read more

Report this page